“Converstionism.” This is one of the few marks of Evangelicalism spoken of by Evangelical historian Mark Noll. Evangelicals believe that people must experience a sincere personal conversion to Jesus Christ. This is a hallmark of Christianity—to be a convert.

Please understand that what follows in no way detracts from this. Conversionism is essential to Evangelicalism. What follows serves as a warning about the dangers that often exist as a person’s conversion from any position to another interacts with their witness and theological integrity.

I was in a spiritual conversation with a gentleman the other day. At times, the conversation became heated. I don’t mind heated conversation or debate so long as it is respectful, honest, and intentional. At one point in the conversation, the gentleman accused me of not being able to see outside of my “Evangelical lenses” that tainted my ability to accept the truth—his version of it of course.

Did you get that. Let me pause and for a bit of repetition. He believed I could not understand because (let me paraphrase):

You cannot see outside of your Evangelical tainted lenses!!!”

Ouch! And what lenses are you wearing?

“None. I am a postmodern. We are the only ones that don’t wear lenses.”

Interesting. Can I have a pair of those?

It seems that this is becoming increasingly common. In fact, it has happened to me three times in the last few weeks (which is why I bring it up here). The assumption is that one is not a careful thinker because they already believe according to a certain tradition. And you know what that means: it is not you believing, but your tradition believing for you.

Isn’t this odd? One cannot see the truth so long as he already thinks he has the truth, but once he does not think he has the truth, he can finally see the truth? While I do believe that there is a hint of truth to this, it can and is often taken to a self-referentially absurd extreme. As well, many of us in the postmodern world like to use it as conversation stoppers when we lack any other recourse. When in doubt and you have no answer, just say this: “You cannot see because your commitment perspective blinds you.”

In each of these cases spoken of above, the accuser, interestingly, was a convert from Evangelicalism. None of them were atheists. In fact, all were still Christians (usually of the emerging variety). One thing was clear: they did not like Evangelicalism. They were bitter about its former promises by which they now believe themselves to have been misled.

The problem is that the supposed objectivity that they think they have attained has become their master. They fail to realize that their conversion, irregardless of its justification, may have actually tainted their view more. They have fooled themselves into thinking that to take off the sunglasses of their former perspective means that they are wearing no sunglasses at all.

In reality, we all wear sunglasses that taints our individual perspective. There is no real option that allows us to see things perfectly, the way they really are.

From what I have seen, converts are sometimes the most unable to see things with a balanced perspective. Because of their belief that their previous faith commitments betrayed them, they approach issues as “enlightened” warriors against those former allegiances. The problem is that they normally wear their bitterness on their sleeve and this further taints the glasses that they think they are not wearing.

The issue is not so much about right or wrong, but about being able to think with integrity. It may involve converting from atheism to Christianity, Christianity to atheism, Evangelical to emerging, Arminianism to Calvinism, or a belief in inerrancy to a denial of inerrancy. I have seen this militant conversion attitude much with regard to former dispensationalists who were “delivered” from the “lies” of the dispensationalism. It is interesting to see their attitude. They often have an absolute dismissive spirit toward any argument that is put forth for dispensationalism. “Oh, I took off those glasses. In fact, I smashed them on the ground. You should too.” But what glasses did you put on after you took these off? “The glasses of truth.” Oh, that is nice. Was there nothing good about the old ones? Can they not still contribute to your understanding in any way at all? At all? Are they completely invaluable? Completely? Is everyone wearing them as a duped idiot? Everyone? That is the way you make it sound since your enlightenment.

Calvinists who convert from Arminianism are also good examples. I am sad to say that we can be the most imbalanced of all. Suddenly, Arminians are absolute losers with regard to theological integrity. All things Arminian are not far from all things Satan. Many of these converts make it their life’s goal to correct the error of Arminianism. And they think they are the most qualified to do so because they used to be one!

I have also seen this attitude quite a bit from former Roman Catholics. These newly enlightened Protestants have a mission of hatred. If this mission converts others, great. But the mission of hatred must go on either way. Misrepresentation, ironically, abounds in these circumstances. They feel as if being a convert gives them a pass to say anything they want. “Don’t tell me what they believe, I used to be one!”

To the credit of Roman Catholics, from my experience, I have seen some balance and grace from converts to their tradition from Protestantism. From what I have seen, many times they don’t exchange their Protestant glasses for anti-Protestant glasses. They retain an appreciation for their former tradition. Most specifically, I think of the prolific conversions of Francis Beckwith, Scott Hahn, and Peter Kreeft. (Note: this is from my experience. I realize that you may have experienced things differently.)

What I am trying to say is that when one converts from on tradition to another, this does not necessarily mean they can speak objectively about the issues. In fact, they often exchange one pair of glasses for its antonymous rival with a special feature of non-appreciation, hatred, and misrepresentation.

I think that we all need to recognize the glasses we wear. We also need to see that when we set down one pair, we always pick up another. There is no objective observer. The emerger of all people ought to know this! This does not discount our ability to discover truth, but it does help us to be more productive, balanced, and realistic in our discoveries.

With regard to converts—especially those from Evangelicalism to some form of emerging: I don’t challenge the legitimacy of any conversion here (that is not my purpose), but I do challenge you to understand that sometimes your conversion can work against your influence. Why? Because it is easy to lose perspective. When I see an emerger who has converted from Evangelicalism and has what seems to be a passionate hatred for Evangelicalism, I tune them out. I can’t help it. Imbalance is something that I have little toleration for. Was Evangelicalism that bad? Aren’t there any good qualities that you still appreciate? Are you working to redeem it or destroy it? Was it that easy to move from love to hate?

If the often said definition of an Evangelical is simply a “nice fundamentalist,” I am afraid the definition of an emerger is quickly becoming an “embittered Evangelical.” No, it is not that simple. And yes, it is sometimes that simple.

  • We need to recognize the relative merits of the various positions.
  • We also need to understand that sometimes conversion does not have to be absolute.
  • Sometimes things are not an either/or, but a both/and.
  • Either way, converts need to convert with thoughtfulness, making the most of their experience and the way it might be used to further the kingdom of God.

C Michael Patton
C Michael Patton

C. Michael Patton is the primary contributor to the Parchment and Pen/Credo House Blog. He has been in ministry for nearly twenty years as a pastor, author, speaker, and blogger. Th.M. Dallas Theological Seminary (2001), president of Credo House Ministries and Credo Courses, author of Now that I'm a Christian (Crossway, 2014) Increase My Faith (Credo House, 2011), and The Theology Program (Reclaiming the Mind Ministries, 2001-2006), host of Theology Unplugged, and primary blogger here at Parchment and Pen. But, most importantly, husband to a beautiful wife and father to four awesome children. Michael is available for speaking engagements. He can be contacted at [email protected]

    16 replies to "Converting from Evangelicalism"

    • Mark Begemann

      “None. I am a postmodern. We are the only ones that don’t wear lenses.”

      Anyone who says that obviously does not understand postmodernism and they certainly aren’t (a) postmodern. Did all three of your experiences with blatant self-contradiction involve people who used the word “postmodern(ism)”? Very interesting.

    • C Michael Patton

      Mark, thanks for the comment. The assumption on many of these conversations when people say, ““You cannot see outside of your Evangelical tainted lenses” is that those who say such don’t wear any lenses, that somehow they see objectively.

      Would these people claim to be postmodern? I am sure they would. That is the irony. One of the best realizations that postmodernism has brought us is that we all have lenses, but to claim superiority based upon this realization does not mean that the postmodern can see well enough to make such a judgment of epistemological integrity on others!

    • Francis Beckwith

      Very well said, Michael. Here’s a few words from my forthcoming book (http://returntorome.com), Return to Rome: Confessions of an Evangelical Catholic, forthcoming from Brazos Press in November (just in time for ETS):

      Much of this book is a celebration of the Christianity that has shaped my life, intellectually and spiritually, both in its Protestant and Catholic forms. I do indeed explain how and why my mind changed, but with respect and admiration for the Evangelical Protestants who the Holy Spirit used to deepen my devotion to Christ, which I carry with gratitude into the Catholic Church….

      I am convinced that if not for the Holy Spirit working through the many gifted and devoted Christian scholars and teachers in Evangelical Protestantism, some of whom I have had the privilege to know, love and study under, my present faith would be significantly diminished. Their tenacious defense and practice of Christian orthodoxy is what has sustained and nourished so many of us who have found our way back to the Church of our youth.

    • Miguel Mesa

      I have found that often what contributes to this staunch antonymous triumphalistic attitude is a failure to appreciate one’s ‘knowing’ and it’s progressive journey.

      I too have seen the brash and condescending attitudes of people who once were a ‘them’ and are now an ‘us’. As an ‘us’ their haughty arrogance exhibits zero humility and thankfulness to how God has created human beings.

      If it is true that knowledge is built upon knowledge then everyone regardless of their position or place should exhibit humility. There is no “arrival” but only epistemic dependence. A chastened rationality is the best part handed to culture by postmodern thought.

      At any given point we are all ‘journeying’ (holistically) and it never ends….even in the eternal presence of God in the consummated new day.

      Good post Michael.

    • Aaron C. Rathburn

      That’s funny-

      It’s a great post, but I particularly liked your specific conversions from “this” to “that.”

      Arminianism to Calvinism, but no mention of the opposite.
      Converting AWAY from Dispensationalism, but not TO it.

      Great post. I like it. I’m pickin’ up what you’re puttin’ down ;-).

      -ACR

    • Richie Batson

      Michael,

      Thank you for the topic–I needed to hear it. I am currently ‘working through’ Calvinism (I’ve been a member of the Methodist church most of my life), and as a result I often have a desire to show my Arminian brothers and sisters the error of their ways. Part of this desire is zealousness on my part in realizing just how much ‘bigger’ (sovereign) God is, but the ugly part is my own pride and arrogance. Thanks again—this will certainly help to temper my thoughts and interactions.

      P.S. My wife and I have begun to look at TTP, and although our traditions are being challenged, we both welcome the opportunity to increase our understanding of God and His Word. It has been a blessing.

    • Peter

      The point made is well taken… but…

      What if one of these positions IS the truth? Is one looking through “glasses”, to then be overly-dismissive of counter arguments, when they are actually contrary to the truth?

      Taken to extreme, we all need to be agnostics and recognise the merits of all positions. But the religion doesn’t grant us to sit on the fence. Some of the things your position allows you to fence sit concerning, may not be an option for those in other positions.

    • […] on the negative of a previous tradition was very well described by C. Michael Patton in his post Converting from Evangelicalism a few weeks ago.  He wrote: From what I have seen, converts are sometimes the most unable to see […]

    • Mata Wang

      There is no discrimination against race, background, or social status.
      Give your date of birth and then attain interesting details
      about your future job,. For example, it permits a US business to
      import European goods and pay Euros, even though the business’s income is in US dollars.

    • satellite internet

      When you share your healt targets – and the way
      a lot you’re exercising each day – you aare feeling
      more accountable.

    • passive income

      My brother suggested I may like this web site. He used to be entirely right.

      This publish actually made my day. You can not imagine simply how a lot time I had
      spent for this information! Thank you!

    • modern tv consoles

      Hi there! This article couldn’t be written much better!
      Reading through this post reminds me of my previous roommate!
      He always kept preaching about this. I will send
      this post to him. Fairly certain he’ll have a good read.
      Thanks for sharing!

    • SC A Cream Review

      It’s truly very complex in this active life to listen news on TV, thus
      I just use web for that purpose, and take the most recent
      information.

    • Possibly Andretti Green Racing’s Danica Patrick, who as 5th fastest will surprise just after a solid run in now’s practice session. So why did Congress lower the sum paid into the
      fund by two percentage points, or up to $2,136 per worker?
      Of all recent drivers with two or far more job starts at Indianapolis Motor Speedway,
      the favorite amongst female fans, Kasey Kahne, has had the most results.

      Recognize and understand your toughest competition. Tony Romo, on the other hand, not
      only has the stats, but has showed his value as well.
      Injuries moved him more than to safety and honesty that is
      wherever he desires to keep.

      Other plusses consist of unique Strip location, good blackjack
      rule sets w/ acceptable table minimums, extremely cozy Strip – view rooms ( Grand
      Tower), and overall provided comps. A contemporary composer was interviewed and one
      of the inquiries was, what trends in modern classical music had been displaying up.

      My wife certainly admires the decor and spots to unwind and
      study right here.

      Pick the most important triathlon education workout routines of the
      week, and just emphasis on acquiring the data out of individuals
      sessions. There are a couple of certain penny slots with good payback percentages and
      I after placed third in an invited slot tournament here that sooner or later paid
      for most of the journey with the winnings. The situation is a bit much more difficult for Sharp,
      even so, as he’s had difficulty having up to speed
      this week and has obligations for up coming weekend. The
      trouble with this move is obtaining sufficient depth to consider his area within.

      Far more energetic young persons, with minds that look
      hard to preserve up with, have a tendency to be the ones total of exuberance for the poetry they are creating.
      It’s getting to be far more likely that it will. 4-Remaining ready to travel was one of the motives I went
      into the snack vending company.

      Other movies demonstrate auto racing as a substitute of chases, with many possessing a plot that is centered on racing and nothing at
      all else. Ought to games be minimize off the Canon mainly
      because a prime 10 sounds far better than a tokens hack top eleven, a top rated twelve or a best twenty-one particular?
      Soon after yesterday’s Pennsylvania 500, both Denny Hamlin and Tony Stewart are in the leading 10 in driver’s factors.
      How then, might you request, does a rookie driver dominate the two races at
      Pocono in his rookie season?

      Denny’s 1st area finish and 8th location standing in the points has manufactured him a front runner for
      Rookie of the Year. The factors behind these choices are as varied as the site visitors themselves but are at least
      partially dictated by picked activities, preferred themes / environments, and journey budgets.
      With his leadership, Florida State should be back in the NCAA Tournament for
      the third 12 months in a row, the to start with time that has took
      place due to the fact 1991-93.

    • đài phun nước

      Hi, There’s no doubt that your site might be having browser compatibility issues.
      Whenever I look at your website in Safari, it looks
      fine however, if opening in IE, it’s got some overlapping
      issues. I merely wanted to provide you with a quick heads up!
      Besides that, great site!

    • Al Guse

      From personal experience, Christians have no idea of how tinted the lenses they are actually wearing are until they take them off for a bit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.