Introduction
In the Genesis creation narrative, scholars and believers alike observe a detailed account of God creating the heavens and the earth. However, a puzzling omission is the explicit mention of the creation of angels.
Four Views on the Timing of the Creation of Angels
Over the centuries, various interpretations have arisen. Here are a few of the prominent viewpoints (it’s worth noting that the nomenclature I use here is my own, and it doesn’t represent any official consensus in church history):
- Eternal Angel View: Although not a view held by mainstream Christians, it posits that angels, similar to God, are eternal beings without a beginning. This perspective somewhat mirrors the Mormon view, which considers man as eternally pre-existing as minds.
- The Prior Existence View: This perspective argues that angels pre-existed the creation of the heavens and the earth, suggesting a different universe or realm that God had previously created. While Saint Thomas Aquinas’ works lean towards this understanding, it’s essential to note that his stance might not be as clear-cut as simply endorsing this view.
- The Implicit Creation View: In this interpretation, angels were created within the Genesis narrative, though not explicitly detailed. This omission might be because they aren’t central to the earthly dominion meant for humans. The creation of the “heavens” might implicitly encompass the angelic beings. Writings from Saint Augustine could be interpreted as leaning towards this view, though again, it’s a nuanced position.
- Gap Theory Angelic Creation View: Differing from the traditional Gap Theory, this viewpoint sees a potential gap not between the first and second verses of Genesis 1, but within the “heavens and earth” mention of verse 1. This suggests that God might have first created the angels with the heavens and then, later on, created the Earth.
Diving Deeper: The “Let Us Make Man” Conundrum
Would the phrase “Let us make man in our image” include pre-existing angels if they were around before Genesis’ events? This question is pivotal because it challenges our understanding—are we created in the image of just God, or both God and the angels?
Contrarily, if we gravitate towards the Implicit Creation viewpoint, which indicates that angels were created just before man within Genesis, it poses a problem: Would it make sense for God to involve these newly created beings in such a monumental decision, as some Christians along with non-Christian Jews believe? Or is this moment better understood from a Trinitarian perspective, suggesting an intra-Trinity conversation rather than a dialogue with angels?
There’s also a linguistic quirk to consider. The phrase uses the plural pronoun “us,” but subsequent verses revert to the singular pronoun “he” when referring to mankind’s creation. This shift in language leads to intriguing questions: If God was talking to the angels, was there a change in the decision-making process? Was there a collaborative intent that ended up being a solo endeavor?!
For those leaning towards a Trinitarian interpretation, the Implicit Creation or Gap Theory viewpoints might resonate more, aligning with the plurality of the Godhead suggested by the plural pronoun and the singularity of nature expressed in the actual creation act.
Wrapping Up
This issue is much greater than the question of how many angels can dance on a head of a pin. The timing of the angelic creation presents a profound theological conundrum, making us reconsider some familiar Scriptures’ nuances.
What do you think? Which position fits best in a Christian theology?
4 replies to "When Did God Create the Angels?"
When? Timing? Was there even Time “before” human consciousness and language came on the scene?
It seems every culture immemorial has had a belief, based on experiences?, in fairies, sprites, imps, gremlins, demons, spirits, and “divine” beings of many sorts. It’s almost as if (until the “scientific revolution”) human collective consciousness has intuited an unseen spiritual, supra-natural realm/dimension populated by “angels” (whether allies or enemies).
Genesis, whether it was revealed sui generis to Moses or some other first Teller, or whether it is the Holy Spirit’s “corrective” to then prevailing Ancient Near Eastern origin stories, it is the beginning of OUR Story. What happened before our Story is barely hinted in canonical texts and is not something we presently know, or presumably can know. It is a human thing to ask many questions that simply cannot be answered. But it’s still challenging, sometimes fun, sometimes leading down dark rabbit holes. (Off the cuff 🙂
Even many traditional Christian scholars now admit that the “Let Us ” has NOTHING to do with the Trinity.
I don’t think it’s talking about the angels. I understand that people attempt to see the passage in its context, and what the context was that people heard it, but I think that that is insufficient. Systematic theology, often vans us to look at the bigger picture especially with stuff like that. miss more importantly, do you have the statement let us make man in our image using plural pronouns, but immediately afterwards it says he made them in his image, using the singular pronouns. I think even the original reader would be confused at that point, and see that there’s something more. I think it is ultimately fulfilled in the Trinity. Although, I do think the angels are also in God’s image to some degree. It just depends on how you define image.
Yes. I’m not sure. There are six or seven different options as to what it means to be in the image of a Trinitarian God. I would say that Dominion is one, and it is the most unique. It is what Heiser believed it referred to.