There are some out there who say that the Bible is filled with myths. To them, all of Christ’s miracles are easily dismissed by attributing them to “the fact” that people in Christ day were more easily swayed by the so-called supernatural. The argument is that people in ancient times were more naïve and could be easily convinced that Christ and his apostles were doing many wondrous things from God because this was a common thing. They believe a norm in that day (because of all the pagan religions) was to believe that miracles were happening everywhere and that you could believe them without any substantial proof. This, according to these liberals, is why the story of Christ was so easily adapted in the first century.
Most of the time this is just assumed for the sake of their argument. But it is certainly not what we find when we study ancient cultures of the time of Christ. One passage that I think illustrates this very well is in John 9, a story of a man born blind healed by Jesus.
Besides the fact that this miracle was seen as an extraordinary miracle (extra-ordinary meaning not ordinary) and besides the fact that the Jewish leaders could not believe it (because it was not ordinary!), the man says something that is quite incedental to the main story, but incredibly important for our current subject. Listen to what he says about the miracle he experienced as he defends Christ to those who would not believe:
John 9:32
Nobody has ever heard of opening the eyes of a man born blind.
This goes against the grain of liberal scholarship that wants to write off belief in miracles as easy and common to the people in biblical times, as if we have graduated to a more thoughtful approach to life.
Why then would this man say no one has ever heard of something like this? He doesn’t say they’ve never saw something like this. Of course THAT is assumed by this man. He says that they haven’t even HEARD of something like this. This goes against every theory that poses a superstitious world of fake miracles easily accepted the Gospel. No one had even HEARD of someone like Christ doing what he did!
I think it’s best that we look for the evidence of such naivety in the Bible itself instead of assuming it before we approach the Bible. People in Christ day were no more naive than we are today, maybe even a little less!
3 replies to "Were People in Christ’s Day More Naive Than Us Today?"
[…] Credo House – Were People in Christ’s Day More Naive Than Us Today […]
[…] Were People in Christ’s Day More Naive Than Us Today – Credo House Ministries — Read on credohouse.org/blog/were-people-in-christs-day-more-naive-than-us-today […]
There’s an excellent section of David Bently Hart’s “Atheist Delusions” which discusses this. The pagans of Jesus’s day were not at all gullible rubes, having learned from experience to be suspicious of attempted chicanery by priests of the Hellenistic gods who played tricks with hidden horns throwing voices in caves, fish scales embedded into ceilings reflecting light, and such like.